How do stakeholders working on the forest–water nexus perceive payments for ecosystem services?
Date: 30-12-19
Score: 5,10
Percental score: 41
Forests, vol. 11, no. 1, art. no. 12, 2019
K. Báliková, T. Červená, I. De Meo, R. De Vreese, T. Deniz, A. El Mokaddem, B. Kayacan, F. Larabi, Z. Lībiete, M. Lyubenova, Š. Pezdevšek Malovrh, K.
Incorporating a root water uptake model based on the hydraulic architecture approach in terrestrial systems simulations
Date: 15-02-19
Score: 5,09
Percental score: 41
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 269-270, pp. 28-45, 2019
M. Sulis, V. Couvreur, J. Keune, G. Cai, I. Trebs, J. Junk, P. Shrestha, C. Simmer, S. J. Kollet, H. Vereecken, and J. Vanderborght
Freshwater pearl mussels from northern Sweden serve as long-term, high-resolution stream water isotope recorders
Date: 11-10-19
Score: 4,96
Percental score: 40
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. Discussions, vol. 2019, pp. 1-37, 2019
B. R. Schöne, A. E. Meret, S. M. Baier, J. Fiebig, J. Esper, J. McDonnell, and L. Pfister
Tracing ecosystem water fluxes using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes: challenges and opportunities from an interdisciplinary perspective
Date: 05-07-18
Score: 4,90
Percental score: 39
Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 2018, pp. 1-23, 2018
D. Penna, L. Hopp, F. Scandellari, S. T. Allen, P. Benettin, M. Beyer, J. Geris, J. Klaus, J. D. Marshall, L. Schwendenmann, T. H. M. Volkmann,